| Economic Forum |
The maiden Budget of Mr Henry Tang delivered on Wednesday did not contain any drastic policy changes. It does not need to primarily because the timing of the economy's rebound has bought Mr. Tang enough time to leave the major fiscal levers alone for another year. Had it not been for the sharp resurgence in sentiment since SARS abated in late May and the confidence booster of CEPA last June, Mr. Tang may well be delivering a much less upbeat outlook for fiscal stability. HK still faces crucial challenges in reforming its existing fiscal structure. The tax base remains far too narrow. The operating deficit needs to be reined in. Government spending must be reduced to less than 20% of GDP (17% is the official target). All these are underlying structural weaknesses, which cannot be papered over by a cyclical rebound in HK's economy. Mr. Tang must not lose sight of that. That is why the downward revision in the overall deficit for 2003/04 (from the initial official forecast of HKD78bn to HKD49bn) should not be viewed as a policy triumph but more, perhaps, the luck of the 'economic' bounce. The key debate over what core fiscal solutions need to be implemented was only briefly addressed in this Budget. For example, the much discussed 3% GST is still being studied, and at best another year or two away from being policy. Mr. Tang flagged the GST issue in order to deepen consumer expectations and broaden public discussion of the technicalities of a sales tax. Elsewhere, there was no hike in major taxes. Given HK's position in the current economic upswing, that is wise. On this and the introduction of a GST will, once more, require good economic timing. The HK consumer is looking healthier. But arguably, not healthy enough to stomach such new measures in the coming fiscal year. Issuing government bonds to finance infrastructure projects is not a bad idea given current conditions. Local interest rates are at record lows onshore, allowing the government to issue debt at relatively low yields. The large crowd of HKD savers earning next to zero interest in HKD bank accounts should also benefit from an alternative conservative asset. Recent retail bond offers have also been well received, such as Cheung Kong and Hutchison. HK has little by way of public debt so adding a little here should not alarm credit agencies. As long the capital raised is invested in worthwhile projects that boosts HK's infrastructure, the arguments for bond issuance are favourable.
Economic performance and prospects
Public Finances (all in HK$ unless otherwise stated)
Issuance of government bonds
Fiscal reserves
|